欢迎访问药物流行病学杂志网站！

设为首页加入收藏

国家科技部中国科技论文统计源期刊

中国科技核心期刊

WHO西太平洋地区医学索引(WPRIM)收录期刊

湖北优秀期刊

《药物流行病学杂志》官方网站与投审稿系统变更通知<点击查看详情>

酸性成纤维细胞生长因子治疗深Ⅱ度烧伤的多中心随机对照临床试验

A Randomized, Multi center and Parallel Control Clinical Trial for Acidic Fibroblast Growth Factor in the Treatment of Deep Second Degree Burn

投稿时间：2014-09-03 修订日期：2014-12-31

DOI：

中文关键词: 深Ⅱ度烧伤酸性成纤维细胞生长因子碱性成纤维细胞生长因子

英文关键词:Deep second degree burn Acidic fibroblast growth factor Basic fibroblast growth factor

基金项目:

作者	单位
柴家科	解放军304医院烧伤整形科北京 100037；
孙永华	北京积水潭医院烧伤科；
夏照帆	上海第二军医大学附属上海长海医院烧伤外科；
廖镇江	上海交通大学附属上海瑞金医院烧伤科；
陈华德	南方医科大学附属广东省人民医院烧伤外科
申传安	解放军304医院烧伤整形科
肖仕初	北京积水潭医院烧伤科；
王志勇	上海第二军医大学附属上海长海医院烧伤外科；
胡晓华	上海交通大学附属上海瑞金医院烧伤科

摘要点击次数: 966

全文下载次数: 0

中文摘要:

摘要目的： 评价重组人酸性成纤维细胞生长因子（rh aFGF）与重组人碱性成纤维细胞生长因子（rh bFGF）治疗深Ⅱ度烧伤的临床疗效与安全性。方法: 采用多中心、随机、平行对照临床试验方法，入选5个研究中心216例深Ⅱ度烧伤患者，两组患者均给予相应抗感染、营养补充治疗。观察组（108例）入院时首先根据创面大小给予rh aFGF1瓶/5 cm2进行冲洗，然后每日3～4喷/cm2喷雾治疗，6～8次/d，对照组（108例）给予rh bFGF治疗，给药方法同观察组。随访30 d后，评价两组患者创面愈合情况。结果:观察组完全愈合时间、溶痂时间、12 d完全愈合率、15 d完全愈合率等指标均明显优于对照组（P<0.05）。治疗7 d后，观察组白细胞水平、渗出评分均明显低于对照组（P<0.01）。两组总评分中度构成比比较，差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论: rh aFGF治疗深Ⅱ度烧伤创面临床疗效优于rh bFGF，安全性相似。

英文摘要:

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of recombinant human acidic fibroblast growth factor （rh aFGF）and recombinant human basic fibroblast growth factor （rh bFGF）in the treatment of deep second degree burn. Methods: A multicenter, prospective, randomized and double blind clinical trial was conducted. Totally 216 cases of deep second degree burn were selected from five research centers and given appropriate antibiotics and nutritional supplement therapy. The wound of 108 cases in the observation group were rinsing with rh aFGF (one bottle / 5cm2) according to the wound area at the time of admission followed by rh aFGF daily spraying, 3 4 press/cm2, 6 8 times a day. The 108 patients in the control group were treated with rh bFGF with the same regimen as the observation group. After the 30 day follow up, the wound healing was evaluated in the two groups.Results: The complete healing time, debridement time, complete healing rate in 12 days and 15 days in the observation group were all better than those in the control group （P<0.05）. After the 7 day treatment, the level of leukocyte and seepage score of the observation group were both lower than those of the control group （P<0.01）. The moderate rate showed significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05). Conclusion: rh aFGF shows better clinical efficacy than rh bFGF in the treatment of deep second degree burn with the similar safety.

查看全文查看/发表评论下载PDF阅读器

关闭