国家科技部中国科技论文统计源期刊   中国科技核心期刊   WHO西太平洋地区医学索引(WPRIM)收录期刊   湖北优秀期刊
《药物流行病学杂志》官方网站与投审稿系统变更通知<点击查看详情>
三组类风湿关节炎治疗方案的药物经济学分析
Pharmacoeconomics Analysis of Three Pharmacotherapeutic Schemes for Rheumatoid Arthritis
投稿时间:2003-07-11  
DOI:
中文关键词:  类风湿关节炎 药物经济学 最小成本分析法 药物联合治疗
英文关键词:Rheumatoid arthritis  Pharmacoeconomics  Cost-minimization analysis
基金项目:
范秀珍  王华杰
邵阳市第一人民医院,湖南邵阳422000
摘要点击次数: 2473
全文下载次数: 107
中文摘要:
      目的:观察三组类风湿关节炎的慢作用药物常用组合联合非甾体抗炎药物治疗方案的治疗效果、不良反应,并进行药物经济学评价,方法:69例患者随机分为三组:A组25例,方案:柳氯磺氨吡啶+甲氨蝶呤+美洛昔康;B组23例,方案:羟氯喹+甲氨蝶呤+是洛昔埭;12组21例,方案:来氟米特+甲氨蝶呤+美洛昔康。结果:治疗12周后A、B、C组的疗效分别为76.00%,73.91%,80.95%,成本分别为789.13,1712.45,2138.73;治疗24周后的有效率分别为84%,86.96%,90.48%,成本分别为1249.27,3066.51,4010.07。结论:三组治疗方案的疗效及不良反应差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。A方案具有最低药物治疗成本(P〈0.01),符合药物经济学观点。
英文摘要:
      Objective:To observe the effectiveness and adverse drug reactions of three pharmacotherapeutic schemes for rheumatoid arthritis. Their results were then analyzed and evaluated with the pharmacoeconomic method. Method:Sixty-nine patients were randomly divided into three groups, Scheme A(25 patients):Sulfasalazine + Methotrexate + Meloxicam; Scheme B(23 patients): Hydroxychloroquine + Methotrexate + Meloxicam; Scheme C(21 patients): Leflunomid + Methotrexate + Meloxicam. Result:After 12 weeks'treatment, the effective rates of schemes A, B, C were 76% , 73.91% and 80.95% , and the costs were 789.13, 1712.45 and 2138.73 yuan, respectively. After 24 weeks treatment, the effective rates of schemes A,B,C were 84% , 86.96% and 90. 48% , and the costs were 1249.27, 3066.51 and 4010. 07 yuan, respectively. Conclusion:The effectiveness and adverse drug reactions of the three schemes had no significant difference (P>0.05), Scheme A had the lowest cost (P<0.01).From a pharmacoeconomic point of view, its cost is superior to the others.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭