国家科技部中国科技论文统计源期刊   中国科技核心期刊   WHO西太平洋地区医学索引(WPRIM)收录期刊   湖北优秀期刊
《药物流行病学杂志》官方网站与投审稿系统变更通知<点击查看详情>
丙泊酚联合硬膜外阻滞对胸部手术高血压患者血流动力学影响
Effects of Propofol Intravenous Anesthesia Combined with Epidural Anesthesia on Hemodynamic Changes in Hypertension Patients Undergoing Thoracic Surgeries〖
投稿时间:2011-04-02  修订日期:2011-06-01
DOI:
中文关键词:  丙泊酚  硬膜外阻滞  胸部手术  血流动力学  高血压
英文关键词:Propofol  Epidural Anesthesia  Hemodynamics  Hypertension
基金项目:
作者单位
周强 武汉市医疗救治中心(武汉 430023) 
摘要点击次数: 1329
全文下载次数: 1210
中文摘要:
      摘 要 目的:观察丙泊酚静脉麻醉联合硬膜外阻滞对胸部手术高血压患者血流动力学的影响。方法:90例行胸腔手术的原发性高血压患者随机分为丙泊酚静脉麻醉组(P组)和丙泊酚静脉麻醉联合硬膜外阻滞组(P+E组),每组45例。硬膜外阻滞选择T7~8或T8~9间隙穿刺置管。丙泊酚靶控输注血药浓度均维持在2~3 μg·ml-1。连续监测HR、动脉脉搏氧饱和度(SpO2)、心输出量(CO)、心脏指数(CI)、收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)和脑电双频谱指数(BIS),同时记录术毕停药后患者自主呼吸恢复时间、清醒时间、拔管时间。结果: 两组诱导前各指标(基础值)差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。麻醉诱导后10 min,患者SBP、DBP、心率、CO、CI均较基础值降低(P<0.05),但两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。开胸即刻,P组患者SBP显著高于基础值(P<0.01),P+E组患者SBP、DBP和CI明显低于P组(P<0.05)。两组患者均未出现麻醉意外,P+E组患者术后自主呼吸时间、拔管时间和清醒时间均较P组显著缩短(P<0.05)。结论:两种麻醉方法均有效,而丙泊酚静脉麻醉联合硬膜外阻滞法能维持患者血流动力学稳定,苏醒较快。
英文摘要:
      ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate and compare the effect of propofol intravenous anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia on hemodynamic changes in hypertension patients undergoing thoracic surgeries. Method:90 primary hypertension patients undergoing thoracic surgeries were randomly divided into two groups, propofol intravenous anesthesia group (P group) and propofol intravenous anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia group (P+E group), 45 in each group. Epidural anesthesia was performed via the T7~8or T8~9 interspace. Their propofol target blood concentration was maintained at 2-3 μg·ml-12, CO, CI, SBP, DBP and BIS were continuously monitored in the perioperative period. Their recovery time for spontaneous breath, wake up time and extubation time were also recorded.Result:No significant differences were observed between P group and PE group before anesthesia (T0, P>0.05). 10 min after the anesthesia induction (T1), the patients' SBP, DBP, HR, CO and CI in both groups were obviously lower than at T0 (P<0.05), but there was no statistic difference between the two groups (P>0.05). After thoracotomy (T2), the SBP in P group was higher than at T0 (P<0.01). Meanwhile, the SBP, DBP and CI in PE group were lower than those in P group (P<0.05). No anesthesia accident was observed in both groups. Their recovery time for spontaneous breath, wake up time and extubation time were markedly shorter in PE group than those in P group (P<0.05). Conclusion:Operations were performed effectively with the two anesthesia methods. Propofol intravenous anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia could maintain the stability of hemodynamics in patients with hypertension.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭