国家科技部中国科技论文统计源期刊   中国科技核心期刊   WHO西太平洋地区医学索引(WPRIM)收录期刊   湖北优秀期刊
《药物流行病学杂志》官方网站与投审稿系统变更通知<点击查看详情>
胺碘酮治疗急性心肌梗死后室上性心律失常的临床观察
Clinical Study of Amiodarone in the Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction Ventricular Arrhythmia
  
DOI:
中文关键词:  急性心肌梗死  室上性心律失常  胺碘酮  利多卡因
英文关键词:Acute myocardial infarction  Ventricular arrhythmia  Amiodarone  Lidocaine
基金项目:
作者单位
余祖善 台州市立医院心内科(浙江台州 318000) 
缪荣华 台州市立医院心内科(浙江台州 318000) 
摘要点击次数: 1265
全文下载次数: 1102
中文摘要:
      摘 要 目的:探讨胺碘酮治疗急性心肌梗死后室上性心律失常的临床效果。方法: 78例急性心肌梗死后室上性心律失常的患者随机分为胺碘酮组和利多卡因组各39例,分别给予胺碘酮和利多卡因治疗。根据24 h动态心电图观察两组治疗后7 d 24 h内室性心律失常发作次数、QRS波时间、PR间期,比较两组疗效和不良反应发生情况。结果:治疗后,胺碘酮组总有效率为94.87%,明显高于利多卡因组82.05%(P<0.05);两组在室性心律失常发作次数、QRS波时间上均较治疗前明显改善,且胺碘酮组改善情况明显优于利多卡因组(P<0.05);胺碘酮组不良反应发生率为17.95%,明显低于利多卡因组33.33%(P<0.05)。结论: 胺碘酮治疗急性心肌梗死后室上性心律失常安全有效,可显著提高治愈率,减少病死率,且不良反应明显低于利多卡因,值得临床推广。
英文摘要:
      ABSTRACT Objective::To evaluate the clinical efficacy of amiodarone in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction ventricular arrhythmia. Methods:78 acute myocardial infarction ventricular arrhythmia patients were selected in our hospital from January 2011 to December 2012, and were randomly divided into amiodarone group and lidocaine group with 39 cases in each group. The therapeutic effect was observed according to 24h dynamic electrocardiogram in the two groups after treatment, and 24h chamber arrhythmia time frequency, QRS wave (s), PR interval (s) and the occurrence of adverse reactions, observed after treatment. Results:After the treatment, the total effective rate was significantly higher (94.87%) in amiodarone group, than that (82.05%) in lidocaine group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); after treatment, the onset times of the two groups and QRS waves of ventricular arrhythmias were significantly improved, and the improving condition of amiodarone group was obviously better than that of lidocaine group, and there was significant difference (P<0.05); the incidence of adverse reaction was significantly lower (17.95%) in amiodarone group than that (33.33%) in lidocaine group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion:Amiodarone in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction ventricular arrhythmia was safe and effective, and could significantly improve the cure rate of the patients, reduce the mortality rate with fewer adverse reactions than lidocaine, and was therefore worth the clinical promotion.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭