国家科技部中国科技论文统计源期刊   中国科技核心期刊   WHO西太平洋地区医学索引(WPRIM)收录期刊   湖北优秀期刊
《药物流行病学杂志》官方网站与投审稿系统变更通知<点击查看详情>
癌痛规范化治疗效果调查
Study on the Effect of Standardized Treatment of Cancer Pain
  
DOI:
中文关键词:  癌痛  规范化治疗  调查
英文关键词:Cancer pain  Standardized treatment  Survey
基金项目:温州市科技计划项目(编号:Y20140016)
作者单位
胡黎川 温州市中心医院药剂科(浙江温州 325000) 
胡显锋 武汉市普爱医院综合科老年病房 
苏银法 温州市中心医院药剂科 
王淑君 温州市中心医院药剂科 
杨秀斐 温州市中心医院药剂科 
摘要点击次数: 761
全文下载次数: 1204
中文摘要:
      摘 要 目的:调查癌痛规范化治疗效果,促进临床合理用药。方法:依据患者入院时间先后顺序随机选取2014年12月~2015年2月我院肿瘤科与其他科室肿瘤患者各30例,分别设为观察组与对照组,观察组行癌痛规范化治疗,对照组未行癌痛规范化治疗,对两组患者癌痛药物治疗的合理性、有效性、药品不良反应与依从性等进行评估比较。结果:观察组合理性评价指标优于对照组(P<0.01);观察组治疗后72 h疼痛评分M(P25,P75)为1(0,2),对照组疼痛评分M(P25,P75)为3(2,5),观察组疼痛评分更低(P<0.01);观察组便秘及成瘾倾向发生率较对照组低(P<0.05),患者依从性更好(P<0.05)。结论:癌痛规范化药物治疗对癌痛治疗起到积极的作用。
英文摘要:
      ABSTRACT Objective:To investigate the effect of standardized treatment of cancer pain, and to promote rational clinical drug using. Methods:According to the order of time sequence of patients, tumor patients were selected from department of oncology and other ward (30 cases each) during December 2014 to February 2015 in our hospital, and set as observation group and control group respectively. The observation group were treated with standardized treatment of cancer pain, and control group were not. Then the rationality, effectiveness, adverse drug reactions and compliance of the two groups with treatment of cancer pain medication were evaluated and compared. Results:The rationality evaluation index was more reasonable in observation group than in the control group (P<0.01); The M(P25,P75) of 72 h pain score after treatment for the observation group was 1 (0,2), the pain score for control group was 3 (2,5), and pain score for the observation group was lower (P<0.01). The incidence of constipation and addiction (P<0.05) were lower in observation group than in control group (P<0.05). The patient compliance was better in observation group (P<0.05). Conclusion:The standardized drud treatment has positive effects on the cancer pain treatment.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭