国家科技部中国科技论文统计源期刊   中国科技核心期刊   WHO西太平洋地区医学索引(WPRIM)收录期刊   湖北优秀期刊
《药物流行病学杂志》官方网站与投审稿系统变更通知<点击查看详情>
羧酸酯酶-2和拓扑异构酶1的表达对伊立替康联合铂类治疗小细胞肺癌的预测意义初探
Prognostic Implication of Expression of Carboxylesterase 2 and Topoisomerase 1 in Small Cell Lung Cancer with Irinotecan Combined with Platinum Treatment
  
DOI:
中文关键词:  小细胞肺癌  羧酸酯酶-2  拓扑异构酶1  伊立替康
英文关键词:Small cell lung cancer  Carboxylesterase 2  Topoisomerase 1  Irinotecan
基金项目:中央高校基本科研业务费项目(HUST:2013ZHYX013)
作者单位
肖晓光 华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院肿瘤科 (武汉 430030) 
刘东 华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院药学部 
张程亮 华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院药学部 
王淑静 华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院肿瘤科 
夏曙 华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院肿瘤科 
邹曼 华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院肿瘤科 
陈元 华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院肿瘤科 
摘要点击次数: 1076
全文下载次数: 1105
中文摘要:
      摘 要 目的:探讨小细胞肺癌组织中羧酸酯酶-2(CES-2)和拓扑异构酶1(topo1)的表达对伊立替康(CPT-11)联合铂类化疗预后的临床意义。方法:分别应用免疫组化方法和酶联免疫吸附方法检测接受CPT-11联合铂类治疗的48例小细胞肺癌患者组织CES-2表达和topo1活性,并与患者化疗的临床预后如无疾病进展期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)进行比较。结果:48例小细胞肺癌标本中,CES-2阳性比为72.9%,topo1活性为(22 459±5 422)U·mg-1 protein,CES-2表达及topo1活性在不同分期小细胞肺癌患者中差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。不同分期小细胞肺癌患者CES-2是否表达与其中位PFS及OS差异亦均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。31例局限期小细胞肺癌患者中,CES-2表达阳性的中位PFS及OS分别是12.3,18个月;CES-2表达阴性的中位PFS及OS分别是10.9,17.6个月。17例广泛期小细胞肺癌患者中,CES-2表达阳性的中位PFS及OS分别是10.5,14.1个月;CES-2表达阴性的中位PFS及OS分别是10.2,13.8个月。结论:CES-2表达和topo1活性尚不足以预测CPT-11联合铂类治疗小细胞肺癌的预后,有待扩大样本量进一步从疗效、毒性及预后方面同时考察。
英文摘要:
      ABSTRACT Objective:To explore the prognosis of expression of carboxylesterase 2 (CES-2) and topoisomerase 1 (Topo1) in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) on irinotecan combined with platinum chemotherapy.Methods:Using the immunohistochemical and ELISA method detected the expression of human CES-2 and Topo1 respectively in 48 patients treated with irinotecan (CPT-11) and platinum regimen, and comparison with progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results:Among 48 cases, the positive rate of CES-2 expression was 72.9%, the totaltopo1 activity (22 459 ± 5 422)U·mg-1 protein, but significant difference was not observed in CES-2 and Topo1 expression between different stages (P>0.05). Moreover, PFS and OS in CES-2 positive or CES-2 negative patients were also not significantly different in LD SCLC and ED SCLC stages (P>0.05). 31 cases with LD SCLC, the PFS and OS of CES-2 positive expression were 12.3 and 18 months respectively, and PFS and OS of CES-2 negative expression were 10.9 and 17.6 months respectively. 17 cases with ED SCLC,the PFS and OS of CES-2 positive expression were 10.5 and 14.1 months respectively, and PFS and OS of CES-2 negative expression were 10.2 and 13.8 months respectively. Conclusion:Expression of CES-2 and Topo1 failed to predict the efficacy of CPT-11 in SCLC. It should be further study on the effect, toxicity and prognosis.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭