国家科技部中国科技论文统计源期刊   中国科技核心期刊   WHO西太平洋地区医学索引(WPRIM)收录期刊   湖北优秀期刊
《药物流行病学杂志》官方网站与投审稿系统变更通知<点击查看详情>
3种药物治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染的疗效及其相关因素分析
Analysis of Influencing Factors and Efficacy of Vancomycin, Teicoplanin and Linezolid in the Treatment of MRSA Infections
  
DOI:
中文关键词:  耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌  万古霉素  利奈唑胺  替考拉宁  疗效
英文关键词:Methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus  Vancomycin  Linezolid  Teicoplanin  Curative effect
基金项目:西安交通大学第一附属医院院基金项目(编号:2016MS-06)
作者单位
郑巧伟1 强荣荣2 王茂义1 1.西安交通大学第一附属医院药学部 西安 7100612.大荔县医院药剂科 
摘要点击次数: 1271
全文下载次数: 503
中文摘要:
      摘 要 目的:评价万古霉素、替考拉宁及利奈唑胺治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)感染的疗效、安全性及相关影响因素。 方法:采用回顾性研究方法,收集某三甲医院2016 年8月~2017 年 1月使用万古霉素、替考拉宁及利奈唑胺治疗MRSA感染的病例,统计不同用药组患者的年龄、性别、感染部位、病原学检查、用药情况、药品不良反应等,评价比较3组疗效。结果:共纳入260例患者,主要是中老年患者,感染部位主要分布在肺部、腹腔、颅内、皮肤软组织及血液。万古霉素组(100例)、替考拉宁组(80例)、利奈唑胺组(80例)临床有效率分别为68.00%,70.00%,73.75%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);药品不良反应发生率分别是23.00%,7.50%,30.00%,替考拉宁组与万古霉素组、利奈唑胺组相比,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);万古霉素组发生肾功能损害16例,利奈唑胺组发生血小板减少16例。〖HTH〗结论:〖HTK〗3组药物有效率不高可能分别与感染部位用药选择、血药浓度监测较少、不良反应发生、首剂负荷剂量不足、合并感染等多种因素有关,临床治疗应加以重视。
英文摘要:
      ABSTRACT Objective:To evaluate the efficacy, safety and related factors of vancomycin, teicoplanin and linezolid in the treatment of MRSA. Methods: Screening of a top three hospital from August 2016 to January 2017, these patients with MRSA infectionin who treated with the vancomycin, teicoplanin and linezolid were chosen. The age, sex, location of infection, etiological examination, medication, adverse drug reactions in three groups were analyzed and the curative effect were compared. Results:A total of 260 patients were included, infected people mainly in the elderly, the main parts of the infection in the lungs, abdominal cavity, intracranial, skin and soft tissue and blood. The clinical effective rates of vancomycin group (100 cases), teicoplanin group (80 cases) and linezolid group (80 cases) were 68.00%, 70.00% and 73.75% respectively, there were no statistical difference (P>0.05). The incidences of adverse drug reactions were 23.00%, 7.50% and 30.00% respectively. There were a statistically significant difference between the tecolanine group compared with the vancomycin group and the linezolid group (P<0.01). There were 16 cases of renal damage in vancomycin group and 16 cases of platelet reduction in linezolid group. Conclusion:The low efficiency of the three groups of drugs might be related to the choice of medication at the infected site, less therapeutic drug monitoring, adverse reactions, inadequate dose loading of the first dose and co infection, and clinical treatment should be emphasized.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭