国家科技部中国科技论文统计源期刊   中国科技核心期刊   WHO西太平洋地区医学索引(WPRIM)收录期刊   湖北优秀期刊
《药物流行病学杂志》官方网站与投审稿系统变更通知<点击查看详情>
替加环素联合头孢哌酮/舒巴坦治疗多重耐药/泛耐药鲍曼不动杆菌肺炎疗效的Meta分析
Efficacy of Tigecycline Combined with Cefperazone sulbactam for Treating Pneumonia Caused by Multidrug/extensively Drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: A Meta analysis
  
DOI:
中文关键词:  替加环素  头孢哌酮/舒巴坦  鲍曼不动杆菌  肺炎  Meta分析
英文关键词:Tigecycline  Cefoperazone sulbactam  Acinetobacter baumannii  Pneumonia  Meta analysis
基金项目:
作者单位
邹靖锋 刘媛 邹梦林 程真顺 武汉大学中南医院呼吸内科 武汉 430000 
摘要点击次数: 1207
全文下载次数: 535
中文摘要:
      摘 要 目的:采用Meta分析方法评价替加环素联合头孢哌酮/舒巴坦对比单用头孢哌酮/舒巴坦治疗多重耐药/泛耐药鲍曼不动杆菌肺炎疗效的差异。 方法:计算机检索WanFang Data、CNKI、SinoMed、VIP、PubMed、Embase、The Cochrane Library、Web of Science (SCI)数据库中替加环素联合头孢哌酮/舒巴坦对比单药治疗多重耐药/泛耐药鲍曼不动杆菌肺炎的随机对照试验,检索时限均从各数据库建库至2017 年10 月,由两位研究者独立筛选文献、应用Cochrane偏倚风险评估工具对其进行偏倚风险评价,提取资料,采用RevMan5.2软件进行Meta分析。 结果:共纳入9篇文献,包括757例患者。Meta分析结果显示,与单用头孢哌酮/舒巴坦比较,联合替加环素治疗能显著提高总有效率(OR=4.68,95%CI:3.07~7.15,P<0.000 01)、微生物清除率(OR=2.31,95%CI:1.64~3.27,P<0.000 01),两组不良反应发生率无明显差异(OR=1.00,95%CI:0.52~1.93,P=0.99)。结论:替加环素联合头孢哌酮/舒巴坦治疗多重耐药/泛耐药鲍曼不动杆菌肺炎的总有效率、微生物清除率高于单用头孢哌酮/舒巴坦,且不增加不良反应发生率;受纳入研究数量和质量的限制,上述结论尚待更多高质量的临床研究的论证。
英文摘要:
      ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness, microbiological eradication and adverse reactions of tigecycline combined with cefoperazone sulbactam against cefoperazone sulbactam caused by multidrug/extensively drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in seriously pneumonia patients.Methods:Randomized controlled clinical trials were screened by searching some databases such as WanFang Data, CNKI, SinoMed, VIP, PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of science (SCI) up to October 2017. Then two reviewers independently accessed the quality of those literatures by the Risk of bias table Tool which conforming to included and exclusion standards and extracted the required information. Meta analyses were conducted by using RevMan 5.2 software. Results: 9 RCTs were included with a total of 757 patients. The results of Meta analysis showed that the combination therapy group was superior to the monotherapy group on the effective rates (OR=4.68, 95%CI: 3.07 7.15, P<0.000 01) and microbial clearance rates (OR=2.31, 95%CI: 1.64 3.27, P<0.000 01). The incidence of adverse drug reactions of two groups had no statistically significant differences (OR=1.00, 95%CI: 0.52 1.93, P=0.99). Conclusion:The combination therapy showed better clinical and microbial clearance rates than the monotherapy without increasing the risk of adverse reactions, which is much better in the pneumonia caused by multidrug/extensively drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭