国家科技部中国科技论文统计源期刊   中国科技核心期刊   WHO西太平洋地区医学索引(WPRIM)收录期刊   湖北优秀期刊
《药物流行病学杂志》官方网站与投审稿系统变更通知<点击查看详情>
艾司西酞普兰与米氮平用于治疗老年抑郁症疗效与安全性的Meta分析
Efficacy and Satety of Escitalopram Versus Mirtaxapine for Senile Depression: A Meta analysis
  
DOI:
中文关键词:  艾司西酞普兰  米氮平  老年抑郁症  Meta分析  随机对照试验
英文关键词:Escitalopram  Mirtaxapine  Senile depression  Meta analysis  Randomized controlled trial
基金项目:2016年度南京医科大学科技发展基金面上项目(编号:2016NJMU030)
作者单位
万盼婷 王萍 哈维超 南京医科大学 第二附属医院药学部 南京 210011 
摘要点击次数: 785
全文下载次数: 437
中文摘要:
      摘 要 目的:系统评价艾司西酞普兰与米氮平对老年抑郁症的疗效与安全性。方法:计算机检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library(2017年第1期)、SinoMed、CNKI、WanFang Data和VIP数据库,搜集有关艾司西酞普兰与米氮平治疗老年抑郁症的随机对照试验(RCTs),检索时限均为建库至2018年1月。由两名研究者独立筛选文献、提取资料并评价偏倚风险后,采用RevMan 5.3 软件进行Meta分析。结果:共纳入5个RCTs,合计294例患者。Meta分析结果显示,①治疗6周后艾司西酞普兰组与米氮平组患者总有效率的差异无统计学意义[OR=0.94,95%CI(0.43,2.06),P=0.87];治疗1,2,4,6周时,艾司西酞普兰组与米氮平组汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评分的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);②艾司西酞普兰在嗜睡、头痛/头昏、体重变化等药品不良反应的发生率均低于米氮平组,差异均有统计学意义[体重变化:RR=0.36,95%CI(0.14,0.95), P=0.04;嗜睡:RR=0.16,95%CI(0.06,0.44),P=0.000 3;头痛/头昏:RR=0.47,95%CI(0.24,0.91),P=0.02],两组其余药品不良反应发生率的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:艾司西酞普兰与米氮平治疗老年抑郁症的疗效相当。在常见的药品不良反应中,米氮平易引起嗜睡、体重变化及头痛/头昏。受纳入研究数量和质量的限制,上述结论尚待更多高质量研究予以验证。
英文摘要:
      ABSTRACT Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of escitalopram and mirtazapine in senile depression. Methods:PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library (2017 No.1), SinoMed, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP database were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of senile depression treated by escitalopram versus mirtazapine from inception to January 2018. Two researchers independently screened literatures, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies. Then Meta analysis was performed by RevMan 5.3 software. Results:Five RCTs involving 294 patients were included. The results of Meta analysis showed that: ①There was no statistically significant difference in the efficacy of patients in the escitalopram group and the mirtazapine group after 6 weeks of treatment (OR=0.94, 95%CI 0.43 to 2.06, P=0.87). At the 1, 2, 4, 6 weeks of treatment, the Hamilton depression scale (HAMD) between the escitalopram group and the mizapine group were not statistically significant (P>0.05). ②The incidence rate of three adverse drug reactions such as somnolence, headache/dizziness, weight change in the escitalopram group were lower than that of mirtazapine group, the difference was statistically significant (weight change: RR=0.36, 95%CI 0.14 to 0.95, P=0.04; somnolence: RR=0.16, 95%CI 0.06 to 0.44, P=0.000 4; headache/dizziness:RR=0.47, 95%CI 0.24 to 0.91, P=0.03). Conclusion:The two groups have similar efficacy. In common adverse reactions, mirtaxapine easily causes somnolence, weight change and headache/dizziness. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify above conclusion.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭